Opinion
‘Israel’s’ military capability to target Iran is pure Sci Fi
The only sane conclusion is that any military attack on Iran – aerial or otherwise – would have to materialize from its neighbouring countries. Iran’s strategic planners are aware of that fact; they know that Israel cannot carry out such an offensive without the involvement of some of its neighbours, and the full support of the western alliance.
The Force isn’t with you…
‘Israel’s’ military capability to target Iran is pure Sci Fi
By Saeb Shaath
07/02/2012
On the morning of Sunday Jan 29, an ‘Israeli’ Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UVA), the Heron TP (also known as the IAI Eitan) crashed during a joint operation by the ‘Israeli’ military and the company responsible for the drone’s development, near the Tel Nof airbase, south of Tel Aviv.
Thought to be the biggest UAV in the world, the Heron TP is the largest in the ‘Israeli’ UAV arsenal. It boasts a 26-meter-long wingspan, can fly for up to 45 hours with a cruise speed of 300 kilometres per hour, and is able to cover a distance of 10,000 kilometres. [1]
These are the vital statistics that led to claims in the New York Times magazine (January 25) that Israel possessed “unmanned aircraft capable of carrying bombs to…targets [in Iran] and remaining airborne for up to 48 hours.”
However, Robert Hewson, editor of Jane’s Air-Launched Weapons dismissed ‘Israel’s’ supposed drone capabilities as “science fiction”, saying “Nobody has the ability to conduct any kind of strategic offensive warfare with drones – not the U.S., not Israel, not anybody.” He stated that “Such a task requires a level of technology and a force of UAVs (unarmed aerial vehicles) that does not exist and will not exist for decades.”
In response to the assertion, by some U.S. corporate media networks, that ‘Israel’s’ Heron TP drones could be used for the aerial refuelling of fighter-bombers for the 1,500 km – 2,000 km flight to Iran, Hewson insisted , “Not a chance. Not even in theory, a total impossibility.”
‘Israel’s’ belligerent posturing with regards to its military capabilities is nothing new, and the most glancing historical overview of its previous military actions demonstrates that it is only ‘Israel’s’ own role as a drone that equips it for anything beyond a very local military impact.
While Israel has used drones for the targeted assassinations of freedom fighters in Gaza and Lebanon, these do not count as complicated operations. Both areas are exposed, and lack the kind of anti-aircraft guns, or missiles, needed to defend themselves against these slow, and very noisy, craft. Such targets, therefore, demand neither range nor stealth on the part of ‘Israeli’ hardware.
Current focus rests on Iran’s military capabilities, which ‘Israel’ views as an existential threat. Previously, of course, this role fell to Iraq; and ‘Israel’ sent F-16 jets to destroy Iraq’s atomic reactor in 1981. That operation, however, was necessarily coordinated with regional player states.
A glance at the attacks against the PLO in Lebanon in 1982 further emphasises the free licence ‘Israel’ was granted, under Camp David’s delivery of Egypt to US-Zionist control, to the immediate region; including that just beyond their borders.
The martial spin-doctoring that ‘Israel’ applies to its offensive against the PLO HQ in Tunisia, in the late eighties, would have us believe that its over-flying F16s plunged an elite band of unbeatable Rambo-types into the action; whence the mission was accomplished. This puts a fanciful, propagandist gloss on the fact that this mission would have been very much impossible without coordination with Bin Ali’s secret police and the robust resources of the US 6th fleet glowering at Tunisia from the Mediterranean Sea.
More recently, in 2007 ‘Israel’ attacked a Syrian factory, claiming that it was an atomic reactor research facility. There are two key points which stand out in the context of this assault; firstly, that Turkey is strategically allied to Israel, and both countries are members of NATO –Israel’s membership is undeclared to facilitate the freedom of movement for NATO in Arabic AND Islamic countries– ; and secondly, that ‘Israel’s’ Mossad has bases in the Kurdish territories in northern Iraq. Reaching Der al-Zoar in Syria was not, therefore, a long range achievement; nor was it an operation which needed high-end military capabilities to succeed. In short, it was not a valid model, for an attack against Iran.
While Israel has the option of using its untested Jerichos intermediate-range ballistic missiles as surprise attack, such an attack would take 10-12 minutes to reach to Iran, leaving plenty of time for Iran to launch a counter-attack.
Scrutiny of the latest Iranian war games reveals that the country has a huge stock of already-tested long- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles. An Iranian source declared last week that they have 200,000 such missiles – enough, in other words, to counter any such onslaught and put ‘Israel’ out of business for a very long time.
The only sane conclusion is that any military attack on Iran – aerial or otherwise – would have to materialize from its neighbouring countries. Iran’s strategic planners are aware of that fact; they know that Israel cannot carry out such an offensive without the involvement of some of its neighbours, and the full support of the western alliance.
On Sunday, 5th of Feb 2012 a senior Iranian commander said that the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) will target any location used as a launchpad for attacking Iran: “The point of origin of an enemy offensive against the Islamic Republic will be attacked by IRGC military units,” IRGC Deputy Commander Brigadier General Hossein Salami added.
I conclude with a quote from a recent article by Fidel Castro, ‘World Peace Is Hanging by a Thread’, Jan 2012.
“….Yesterday I had the satisfaction of having a pleasant conversation with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. I had not seen him since 2006…During our meeting yesterday, I noted that the Iranian president was absolutely calm and tranquil, completely unconcerned about the Yankee threats and, fully confident in the capacity of his people to confront any aggression and in the effectiveness of their arms —which, in large part, they produce themselves— to inflict an unpayable price on its aggressors. In reality, we hardly spoke about the topic of war.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was focused on the ideas he had presented at the Main Hall of the University of Havana during his conference on the struggle of humankind: “Moving towards reaching and achieving peace, security, respect and human dignity as a fundamental desire of all human beings throughout history.”…” [2]
—————————————————————————————————-
Saeb Shaath: Writer, thinker, public speaker, Middle Eastern affairs Expert.
—————————————————————————————————-
[1]. ‘Israeli’ superdrone explodes in the sky :https://saebpress.com/2012/01/israeli-superdrone-explodes-in-the-sky/
[2].World Peace Is Hanging By A Thread :https://saebpress.com/2012/01/world-peace-is-hanging-by-a-thread-by-fidel-castro/
Featured
‘Yemenis said it very clear, a blockade will be faced by blockade’: Sha’ath
Saeb Shaath, author and commentator, says Yemen’s control over the Bab al-Mandeb Strait has emerged as a major strategic challenge for Saudi Arabia and its Western allies, arguing that any disruption to the vital maritime corridor could have far-reaching consequences for global trade, energy markets, and regional security.
News / Interviews ‘Yemenis said it very clear, a blockade will be … | TikTok
He also discusses that Yemen’s deterrence capabilities have shifted the regional balance of power while increasing pressure on Riyadh to seek a political solution rather than military escalation.
Featured
‘Saudis Arabia is not respecting its neighbours’: Commentator
Yemen will enter a new stage to fully reclaim its rights, Saudi Arabia will find itself in a major strategic deadlock and will bear high costs for its aggression.
Commenting to PressTV on Saudi Arabia’s attack on Sana’a International Airport, author and commentator Saeb Shaath said ”Saudi Arabia’s actions destroy neighbours’ trust and destabilize the region”.
Yemen’s Foreign Ministry in Sana’a has condemned Saudi Arabia’s attack on Sana’a International Airport, saying that the strike marks the end of the truce and the beginning of a new phase of war.
In a statement on Monday, the Ministry declared that Yemen will enter a new stage to fully reclaim its rights, warning that Saudi Arabia will find itself in a major strategic deadlock and will bear high costs for its aggression.
Separately, the spokesman for the Yemeni Armed Forces, Brigadier General Yahya Saree, stated that “the Saudi aggression will not go unpunished,” adding, “The Saudi enemy has ended the de-escalation phase, and must bear responsibility for all potential consequences.”
The Yemeni Ministry of Transport announced in a statement that “Saudi Arabia’s bombardment of Sana’a airport and violation of the Yemeni airspace signifies the Riyadh regime’s insistence, with Americans’ and Zionists’ push, to continue the siege.”
On March 26, 2015, Saudi Arabia and its Arab allies initiated a blockade on Yemen, marking the beginning of a comprehensive war, backed with military, political, and logistical assistance from the United States and other Western countries.
The war has led to the deaths of tens of thousands of people in Yemen, while failing to achieve its primary goal of reinstating the previous government that was aligned with Riyadh.
Amid a power struggle, the government fled the country, leading Yemen’s popular resistance movement, Ansarullah, to take charge of state affairs.
After a delicate ceasefire brokered by the UN in 2022, multiple rounds of significant attacks were launched against Yemen by the United States, Britain, and the Israeli regime.
The assaults aimed to weaken Sana’a’s ability to conduct solidarity strikes against Israeli targets, which were being conducted in response to Tel Aviv’s genocidal actions in the Gaza Strip.
Culture & Arts
Sha’ath: Resistance axis to grow stronger after Ayatollah Khamenei.
Resistance axis to grow stronger after Ayatollah Khamenei
Thursday, 09 July 2026
An interview with, West Asia political expert Saeb Shaath discusses why massive participation in funeral processions held in Iraq for the martyred Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, goes beyond symbolic mourning, arguing that it reflects growing regional solidarity with Iran, shifting political dynamics in West Asia, and the enduring influence of Ayatollah Khamenei on the regional Axis of Resistance.
He also examines how Ayatollah Khamenei’s leadership helped unite diverse resistance movements around a common anti-imperialist agenda and what this legacy could mean for the future of the region.
-
Articles15 years agoChe’s triumphal return to Wall Street
-
Featured8 years agoرحلة السفر من غزة الى مصر
-
News15 years ago‘Israel’ Hijacking of Freedom Wave flotilla “Violent and Dangerous”, Activists beaten.
-
Featured15 years agoPalestine Ambassador to Ireland, ‘we support the Moyle District Council’s proposal to twin with Gaza City’.
-
Culture & Arts14 years agoGamal Abdel Nasser, on the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt
-
المقالات و الاخبار العربية12 years agoغزة آخر قلاع المجد
-
Culture & Arts15 years agoNo Negotiations with Apartheid ‘Israel’ – Let it Self-Destruct!
-
Articles15 years agoConfessions of 40 Turkish intelligence officers captured in Syria

